Navigation

    Ellaism Forum

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    1. Home
    2. majordutch
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 1
    • Posts 2
    • Best 1
    • Groups 1

    majordutch

    @majordutch

    1
    Reputation
    3
    Profile views
    2
    Posts
    0
    Followers
    0
    Following
    Joined Last Online
    Website ellaism.io

    majordutch Follow
    administrators

    Best posts made by majordutch

    • RE: Ellaism and Frontier alternative upgrade paths!

      @differdrift sorpaas states the "wrapper block with strict consensus rules" route will take an indeterminate amount of time, a couple times in the proposal.

      ...and thus massively increase the development time.

      However, the disadvantage is that it may take a long time to be implemented, as it relies on a feature not yet ready in Substrate.

      To me, it seems to be an obvious indicator that if we went that route, we would have to consider a long road to implementation (if ever?). Is it necessary? I do not have enough knowledge to answer that. I presume you could err on the side of caution and say strict consensus is better than relaxed consensus.

      Additional questions could be:

      • What is a reasonable time estimate to build in the additional complexity?
      • What is the cost-benefit to this? Maybe it is not really necessary for Ellaism, but could be more important for a large chain, such as Ethereum.

      The Core Paper site has a lot of great information, largely technical, but worth reading.

      posted in General Discussion
      majordutch
      majordutch

    Latest posts made by majordutch

    • RE: Ellaism and Frontier alternative upgrade paths!

      @differdrift sorpaas states the "wrapper block with strict consensus rules" route will take an indeterminate amount of time, a couple times in the proposal.

      ...and thus massively increase the development time.

      However, the disadvantage is that it may take a long time to be implemented, as it relies on a feature not yet ready in Substrate.

      To me, it seems to be an obvious indicator that if we went that route, we would have to consider a long road to implementation (if ever?). Is it necessary? I do not have enough knowledge to answer that. I presume you could err on the side of caution and say strict consensus is better than relaxed consensus.

      Additional questions could be:

      • What is a reasonable time estimate to build in the additional complexity?
      • What is the cost-benefit to this? Maybe it is not really necessary for Ellaism, but could be more important for a large chain, such as Ethereum.

      The Core Paper site has a lot of great information, largely technical, but worth reading.

      posted in General Discussion
      majordutch
      majordutch
    • A Path Forward for Ellaism

      Long time contributor sorpaas has formally proposed an upgrade path for Ellaism. As the detail and procedure may change through ongoing discussions, the best place to get the most recent information is in the GitHub discussion in the Ellaism Meta repository. You can also join the Ellaism Discord, where additional discussions will take place.

      All Ellaism holders have a say in whether or not this plan will be executed.

      To vote Yes, send a zero-value transaction from your wallet to Ellaism address 0x16816ad49805cA30F967FD3682e79544b6065B67

      To vote No, send a zero-value transaction from your wallet to Ellaism address 0x0cE60Fce7D53160Fb0e1323849993f4bb90B0EEe

      You can see the current vote results on the Ellaism Vote page.

      posted in Announcements
      majordutch
      majordutch